I went to the polls Tuesday. I thought about skipping this
one but the yard signs lining the intersection left we with a twinge of guilt.
It was the primary for the local and state races. Primaries are a tough sell
for voters. It’s like watching pre-season football, it can be entertaining but
it doesn’t count for much. All it accomplishes is to weed out the scrubs, break
a few hearts. Not that I don’t appreciate living in a democracy, but do we
really have to vote on county commissioner and sheriff? Someone tell me what
they do please, other than order business cards with their new title. Can’t the
mayor, or the police chief, or the city manager, or perhaps the county boss guy
just pick somebody? Why can’t the police chief do the job of the sheriff? Get
him an assistant and save some money.
It’s fair to say we don’t know these people unless they
really screw up. And when they do, voters are indignant that they held the
position as long as they did. The Tulsa sheriff position is open because of just
such a screw up. His office got caught falsifying records on fitness tests and firearms
for one particular cop, reserve officer to be specific. Oh, and turns out the
reserve cop shot a guy, killed him actually. It was all over the news, the guy was a drug dealer. The
sheriff was at least partially guilty. Police departments should avoid two
things more than anything else: Nepotism in the department and killing people.
Tulsa PD had a double dose. It’s like they stepped on that rake in the front
yard and backed into a kid on a bike with their cruiser. The reserve deputy was
a ‘friend’ and financial supporter of the sheriff turning an ugly situation
into a full scale disaster.
So there is an opening now in the sheriff’s office. We want
and need a new one, but what do we really know about choosing one? The local
reporters were indignant about how the sheriff had been in the position since
the late eighties. The tone of the press was how-could-such-a thing-happen? I
imagine he kept getting re-elected because the department avoided the worst
kinds of embarrassment. Ironically elections are supposed to weed out this type
of favoritism, except we had an election and got Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall—or
so it seemed.
Shortly after college I was at a friend’s wedding talking
politics and she remarked that in Australia (where she was from) citizens are
fined for NOT voting. I thought it sounded wonderful but she said it forced
people to vote for people and issues they didn’t really understand. They just
went to the booth to avoid the fine. I hadn’t thought of it that way before
because in a democracy voting is not only a right, it’s a duty.
I am starting to
think maybe one less election per year would be a good thing, or at least one
less position to vote for. Until then I guess I will do my homework (even in
the primaries) and do what I’ve always done, select the candidate with the best
yard signs.
No comments:
Post a Comment