I finished reading another Harry Bosch novel by Michael
Connelly. I think it was number 7, A
Darkness More Than Night. I’ve never
read one I didn’t like. You’d think detective novels with a lonely booze loving
cop would get old. They don’t. How many stories about former Rangers (or
Seals) that track and kill bad guys do we really need? Who doesn’t love tough
guys? As long as the stories are compelling we’ll keep reading them. It doesn’t
matter if something has been done a thousand times. If you keep making it
great, we’ll keep buying it.
Partly the stories
entertain because there is a mystery at the heart of it all. Not just murders
but character stuff, will he win her over? Is the secret investor her dad? Does
the family know the dog is still alive? And like Dune (which I just finally read) will the prince fulfill his destiny? It’s a puzzle to figure solve piece by piece.
I like knowing how the writer puts the information together. I don’t mean I
want to find an interview where he talks about his writing process. Those
interviews never sound quite right and the answers are all hindsight so it
sounds way more polished when we hear it.
I want to look over
his shoulder as he puts the thing together and takes out extra information. I
want to watch what happens as he fills in the plot holes that didn’t work well
on the first draft. I’m curious how he lays out the plot. Does he know the
murder from the start and the one who did the deed? My dad used to draw these
mazes for us to solve. They were simple sketches that only took a few minutes for
him to complete. He always drew the direct path first though, that’s how you
have to do it. Once you have a completed path to the end you need only fill in
false lanes and double backs to trick the kids. That’s how I assume authors
handle mysteries, not only murder stuff but big reveals and climax endings.
They start with a simple story of a guy who murders his wife’s lover and then
fill in the details to spin a yarn for the reader. Maybe put in some false
flags to draw out other characters. This is where the fun is right…in trying to
hide motives and play the guessing game?
I know that isn’t always how it happens though. I’ve heard
writers (Stephen King comes to mind) say that they don’t always know what
happens in the end. They start with an idea for a scene or a character and write from there. That kind of surprises me. Novels don’t have to be done any
particular way of course but it seems like it's creating extra work with no obvious
resolution in mind. That’s why I opt for the over the shoulder view while they
work their magic. Is that creepy? To sit there and stare as they clack away on
the keyboard and curse at the blank screen waiting for ideas to pop? That’s
what I do on even silly little writing projects.
I said once before that I loved to read fiction and I liked
to write non-fiction. I think that might be because fiction is completely daunting
to me and feels like a lot of work. All of that plotting and arranging dead ends can end up confusing the writer too. It’s probably not a lot different but
impressions are what they are and until you do it yourself that’s all it will
ever be, an impression. Until I get up the nerve to write a book I’ll have to
just keep reading them.
No comments:
Post a Comment