Evidence That Demands A Trial: Durham's Report Blames FBI Arrogance
Once upon a time, not long ago, I was very optimistic about the particulars of the Durham Report.
Finally, the plot by the FBI to overthrow a
President would be exposed. Justice would finally be done. Crooked officials
would be held to account. The plotters who cooked this up would be hoisted on
their own petard. Everyone could at long last make some sense of Trump’s anger
toward Comey, McCabe, Strzok and even Sessions. I don’t believe anyone will
actually be held to account for this. Certainly they won’t be tossed into jail
and denied a proper defense like the January 6th folks. But at least
the report is forcing some conversations about the behavior of the FBI.
I didn’t read the whole report but I’ve read all the news
accounts and they’re all in agreement as to what it contains, sort of. If your
information is a little rusty on this Trump Russia stuff I’ll give you a brief
history. During the 2016 campaign, Hillary Clinton cooked up some opposition
research with the help of a former British spy, Christopher Steele and Fusion
GPS. They put a dossier together with lies about Trump colluding with Russia.
The FBI used this to get a warrant to spy on the Trump campaign. They knew it
was lies. They knew it was illegal. There was never any evidence of the Trump
campaign’s illegality.
They were essentially working for the Clinton campaign and
the White House was helping them. My biggest problem with the whole charade,
reports, investigations, dossiers and depositions of this sordid story is the
lack of a genuine penalty for such an obvious crime. That lack of a penalty is
the reason the fake investigation went so far. The FBI knew they had a backstop
in place, Trump called this backstop the “deep state”.
In spots, Durham’s
language in the report is worded to make the FBI seem like a sloppy crew
instead of the gangsters they really are. Essentially he says they did a poor
job. But the point was to overwhelm Trump and keep him from looking into
Clinton’s illegalities. By that measure they did an amazing job. Durham isn’t stupid.
The report implies mishandling and bias, even breaks from
tradition like letting Trump’s people know they’re being surveilled. I know you
aren’t supposed to assign motive when writing these things, but common.
Everyone can read between the lines. Someone who breaks down a door and steals
jewelry isn’t “Failing to let the owners know of their arrival”. They are “crooks”
because their actions are criminal and everyone can see it.
The sheer number of ‘mistakes’ from the FBI is a signal that
“Crossfire Hurricane” wasn’t a good faith investigation. Especially since the mistakes
always fall against Trump.
Crossfire Hurricane launched just days after they got their
hands on the Steele Dossier. The dossier was a load of sensational nonsense, salacious
enough (Russian hookers peeing) that the media would be guaranteed to pick it
up. But starting the investigation right after getting the dossier? That’s as
close to proof as you can get that they weren’t interested in corroborating the
story. They were on team Clinton. They didn’t need to corroborate anything. Steele
used a guy named Igor Danchenko to ‘investigate’ Trump in Russia. He made up a
dirty story and the FBI ran with it. They even told Christopher Steele they
would pay him up to a million if he could verify the claims in the dossier. He
couldn’t. Even the feds didn’t think there was anything to it.
I knew this whole Durham Report business was in trouble when
he couldn’t get a conviction on some very clear charges against MichaelSussman. He’s the lawyer from Perkins Coie that lied to the FBI about his
involvement with the Clinton campaign. Igor Danchenko was also acquitted on
charges of lying to the FBI. Yes, these are low level charges. But if you can’t
get convictions the rest of your case dries up. It’s tough to catch big fish
when all you can manage is seaweed along the river bank. I’m also not sure how
much John Durham wanted to get convictions. He tried the cases in front of Washington
DC juries. They’re notoriously sympathetic to the Democrat party. Most likely
he compiled the report with enough information to implicate half of the Justice Department.
At the very least, the report is another red pill for Americans
who still think the FBI is full of dedicated law and order types. Their lawless
behavior is proof that they didn’t fear prosecution. I’m sure we’ll get Senate
hearings in the coming months and we might get a few good one liners from Cruz
and Hawley. But real prosecution? naw brah.
It’s been said you should never assign malice to that which
can be explained by incompetence. With the FBI it’s time to invert that. Perhaps
this time will be different; nothing changes until the American people demand
it though.
No comments:
Post a Comment