I
took this meme from Reddit because it’s funny. I think it provides us with a
window into the way American citizens incorrectly view the founding. This is
the Constitutional Convention, it has to be or the joke doesn’t work. Did America's founders sit down and discuss how much freedom to permit to the newly formed
states, people? Who did they try to protect, the citizens or the government?
America
is fundamentally different because it recognized the rights of individuals and
restricted the government's ability to hamper them. The idea that the founders
'decided' to allow guns gets it completely backward. The right to own guns and
speak freely are inherent rights, or inalienable. In other words they can't be
taken away. Why? because they are God given (natural) and an essential part of what makes
people human. If God created humans with certain inherent freedoms than who can
really take them? Can you steal a person’s character or just suppress it?
I
remember reading a newspaper opinion years ago that took a dim view of the ultra
rich in America. I think the point of it was that ‘we shouldn't be overly
excited when someone like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett gives money to charity.
The gifts are appreciated but the largess of the rich is because of this
country’s willingness to provide opportunities for them. ‘We' as a society
allowed them to make the money through friendly laws and easy regulation.
Nonsense. It’s true they had the good fortune to apply themselves in a country
that respects diligence. They also might have had a better start through
education or skill, Gates had both. None of that is because “We” the planners
allowed it.
It's an attitude that puts the authority into
the hands of a government (planners) and not the 'consent of the governed'.
It's like the saying the government allowed you to become rich, when the truth
is our laws support the ability of citizens to pursue happiness. Just because countries
everywhere got this wrong doesn't mean we should too. It’s important to see the Constitution as a complete break from that philosophy of kings and tyrants. It
makes the individual the centerpiece, the rational being seeking liberty. The Constitution was meant to put restrictions on government and allow natural
processes to flourish. Natural processes included freely worshiping God or not,
setting up a business or working for one, buying and selling property.
Individuals
get hung up on things like guns because of the danger they pose in the hands of
criminals. But they miss the essential part of the Second Amendment which is
not that the founders 'allowed us to have guns'. This is insulting. They
recognized that restrictions on a person's life and property were not within
their purview. It was none of their damn business and they knew it. So they put
hefty restrictions on the government around certain things, speech and firearms
are just some of the most important.
We
can argue all day about what limits are appropriate on speech and weapons.
Courts have mostly held very lose restrictions on speech and thankfully, guns
laws are getting looser all the time. Most people don't believe you should be
allowed to keep a Mark 19 grenade launcher in your garage mounted on an old
F150. Although it's tough for me to think of a better way to spend a Saturday
than driving through open land firing at targets. Cities have restrictions that
rural communities would never have. It makes sense to a degree but if it
infringes on an individual's basic freedom it has to go. The Second Amendment
is not without restrictions though and courts constantly hear new arguments.
You
aren’t allowed to keep a howitzer in your driveway. This is primarily an order
of magnitude problem. Firearms don't pose this enormous downside. It's why we
restrict fully automatic weapons with some exceptions. A lot of my libertarian
friends think drugs fall into the same category and should come with no restrictions. I don't, but that's a discussion for another day. I
understand the logic, but drugs to me are the howitzer that kills thousands
even if most people can get high and function like an adult.
None
of this is to say that our laws are perfect or beneficial to everyone. But the
principle that the founders (Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton) were concerned with
what to grant the new citizens is plainly wrong. They always began by
restricting the government first.
I
know the meme is just a joke. It's a funny way to show how different our
country is from others. We love guns. We love to talk. We never shut up
actually. But we live in an age when so much is planned and orchestrated that
it's important to remember the core principle of the founding, individual
liberty through natural rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment