“There are two types of people in this world…” goes a famous
line from Bill Murray’s What About
Bob “Those who like Neil Diamond,
and those who don’t. My ex-wife loves him.”
Even though he is neurotic to a crippling
degree, Bob does what most of us do when trying to understand others and himself, sort and segregate.
It’s easier to understand others when we boil
it down to A or B choices. The desire to classify along personality lines is more
about figuring out “us” than learning about “them”.
Buzzfeed and Facebook are awash in ‘this or that’ type
quizzes that sort users based on personality. From “What Lord of the Rings
character are you?” to “Which 80’s sitcom describes your life?” All suggest an
interest in self-discovery. What is at the heart of it though? Why the need,
mostly for fun, to separate and label? It has more to do with seeing ourselves
a certain way than putting others in a box. By solving key components of self, we can map out life easier and find our tribe. A touch
of laziness is to blame for an obsession with finding the perfect track. Who
doesn’t want to find the path of least resistance? Who hasn’t thought “Give me
the relationships and careers where I’m destined for awesomeness”?
Questionnaires give us the confidence of figuring out some missing piece of our own little puzzle.
The popular psych profile Myers-Briggs separates people into
16 groups but starts with 4 broad characteristics. I don’t think I’ve ever read
through and thought about how to classify others though. I’m only interested in
where I fall along the scale (ISFJ in case you wondered). Maybe it is just old
fashioned selfishness to figure out ‘me’ first and consider others later. But
if selfishness is the culprit it proves my point. We want to figure out ‘us’ in
a larger ‘we’ picture.
The individuality I'm describing is closer to self-interest than vanity. There is some corner of the brain that lights up when
we solve a tough math problem or find answers to a baffling question. It’s a
confidence builder. Finding some hidden gem of information through diligent
effort is its own reward, much more when we do it ourselves. Tests on
personality force us to be honest by presenting scenarios and demanding
responses. A full picture of our makeup is only possible when we tell the
truth. Also, valid profiles aren’t based on right or wrong answers, the
incentive to cheat is removed.
A lot of this depends on how serious you take personality
profiles. At best, they are trait markers and at worst, silly time wasting
fun.
Discovering our type
can be limiting. Tying personality strictly to trait prevents us from
taking chances in areas of life we don’t feel qualified to engage in. This
allows a that’s-not-my-job attitude to seep in keeping us from accepting
challenges we might really need. We play
to type instead of working through a default mindset.
My job requires me to help a lot of coaches and athletic
directors. Most are highly organized and competitive. Occasionally they’re demanding
and used to getting their own way. This is challenging when their deadlines
aren’t met, which happens sometimes. Past success lays the groundwork for
future disputes, so naturally they insist on being assertive. It’s worked
before. Playing to type for them means holding ground and pushing demands.
Losing an argument can be catastrophic and they’re likely to hold a grudge. By
not moving on from a no-win situation they hurt themselves by personalizing the
affair.
Most of the studies on personality show that people can
change their type over the years. If there is one benefit to discovering how
you interpret the world, information and personal relationships, it shows us
where improvement is possible. Improvement is possible when we have all the
information. People with naturally aggressive tendencies can learn to control
anger and move on without hard feelings. The same goes for those with agreeable
personalities. By sticking to their beliefs they can break out of the passive
mold that allows others to push them around. Personality tests like
Myers-Briggs can illuminate some of “whys” and “what fors” we drift toward
instinctively. Change requires rigorous attention to improvement though.
Wanting to improve areas of personality is universal,
although there is probably a type that doesn’t believe they need to. I did some
quick searching to find out what self-improvement actually means to people.
Most agree on the basic “what’s”, happiness, health and relationships. The “how’s” diverge a little. Trying new
things and breaking type is good advice because it forces us to use skills that
aren’t yet developed. Like trying out a new workout routine, it makes us
uncomfortable at first but strengthens muscles we didn’t know we had. Teaching
a class, joining a club and learning a language are some popular recommendations
(from Quora at least).
These are self-focused ideas but it’s tough to help others
without first challenging yourself. There is room for improvement everywhere,
whether you like Neil Diamond, associate Family
Ties with your upbringing or prefer reading books to watching movies.
Shortcuts don’t exist for change; that includes personality tests.
No comments:
Post a Comment